Why does the progressive-socialist left promote incivility, anger and seething rage against America? Is it because they cannot accept the American ideal of freedom, rule of law and limited government?
It is settled that the progressive-socialist wing of the Democratic Party refutes the American ideal of freedom. We see this refutation in progressive-socialist big government programs and increasingly burdensome regulation, which is a proxie for socialist control.
We see this refutation in the Constitutional over reaching of Obamacare; in an Executive Order replicating the Dream Act, which failed to pass in Congress [so Obama assumes legislative prerogative over Congress?]; and in Obama’s rejection of the rule of law in sending armed forces into Lybia without Congressional approval.
We see this refutation in progressive-socialist belief that the ideal individual concept of freedom, which has been successful for over 235 years, is flawed and must be transformed into a progressive-socialist ideal of shared sacrifice, where an all-controlling government chooses the winners and losers.
Recently, Stephen Chu, Secretary of Energy, discussing the phase-out of incandescent light bulbs, stated “We are taking away a choice that continues to let people waste their own money.” Where in the Constitution does it say the Secretary of Energy can take away my right to choose?
First, it was the Liberals who attempted to destroy the American ideal and transform America into a progressive-socialist cesspool. Ironically, whenever socialism has been tried it failed. “All men are created equal,” says the American Declaration of Independence. All men shall be kept equal,” say the socialists” [Winston Churchill].
At a rally, shortly after Representative Giffords survived an assassin’s bullet, President Obama called for civility: "At a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized - at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who think differently than we do - it's important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds." Yet, one month later Obama attacked Governor Scott Walker for his assault on public sector unions.
Yet, this bad behavior goes unchecked by the so-called main-stream-news-media. "Rush Limbaugh needs to choke to death on his own fat," according to radio host Mike Malloy. .Michele Bachmann should "slit [her] wrist!" Montel Williams told his Air America radio show. "We ought to rip [Dick Cheney's heart] out and kick it around and stuff it back in him," MSNBC's Ed Schultz raged.
MSNBC host Ed Schulz called conservative talk show host and former attorney Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut” and then a “talk slut. One commentator stated, “Schultz's tone is so nasty as to be disturbing.”
During debt ceiling negotiations, President Barack Obama says the debt ceiling should not "be used as a gun against the heads" of Americans to retain breaks for corporate jet owners or oil and gas companies. So much for civility . . . Barack Obama forgot to sign his own pledge. What would Giffords say?
Liberalism, progressivism and socialism are collectively an ideology of hate and rage. It is long past time for leaders of the Democratic Party to reject this ideology of hate and rage. It will not happen. The Party is controlled by the Ragers and Haters. Obama’s anger is plainly visible below the façade of coolness he usually portrays to others, giving followers license to rage and spew hatred. The vast majority of hate language and rage stems from the liberal-progressive-socialist bloc of the Democratic party.
Monday, July 11, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment